August 2016.


A Newport Beach resident is asking a judge to order that City Council candidate Fred Ameri’s birth name – Farrokh – be used on election materials.

The suit filed Monday by William Stewart in Orange County Superior Court, alleges that City Clerk Leilani Brown and Orange County Registrar of Voters Neal Kelley are misleading voters by allowing Ameri to appear on the Nov. 8 ballot using his widely known nickname, Fred, instead of Farrokh, his legal first name.

Ameri, a 19-year resident of the city, is running to replace termed-out Councilman Keith Curry, who represents District 7. He said he does not know Stewart and believes the issue of his name is meant to stroke fear and racism against him at the polls.

The former planning commissioner came to the U.S. from Iran when he was 19 to attend school, he said.

“Associating me to be an Iranian and associating me with the terrorist government of Iran is a dirty trick,” Ameri said.

Attorney Bruce Peotter, who represents Stewart and is the brother of Newport Beach Councilman Scott Peotter, disputed Ameri’s assertion that race is a factor in raising the issue of his name.

“It appears he wants to make race the issue,” Peotter said. “He simply needs to follow the law and use his real name.”

Also running for the seat are attorney Phil Greer and Finance Commissioner Will O’ Neill.

The lawsuit lists the Irvine Police Department, a notary public and a U.S. District Court clerk who processed Ameri’s naturalization papers as those who know Ameri as Farrokh, according to court documents.

The suit also references Ameri’s legal name for misdemeanor charges in 2004 for driving with a blood-alcohol level over the legal limit, DUI and reckless driving that were dismissed the next year, according to court records.

Stewart is also requesting portions of Ameri’s candidate statement be removed for what he says are references to other candidates.

“I am personally providing the majority of my campaign’s funding, making me the only independent candidate,” the statement said.

Peotter said Ameri’s candidate statement should have only referred to his experience.

“The clerk should have prevented that because it’s against the law to refer to other candidates,” he said.

The California election code says the candidate statement should be limited to only the candidate’s own background and qualifications.

Ameri said everyone knows him by his nickname and that whoever is behind the lawsuit has intentions to mislead voters.

“I’ve lived in the country for more than 55 years and I’ve been using Fred since I was a teenager,” he said.

A court date is not yet scheduled on the matter.

Contact the writer: 714-796-2478 or [email protected]


NEWPORT BEACH, CA – Recently retired California Supreme Court Associate Justice Marvin R. Baxter has endorsed Will O’Neill for Newport Beach city council, district 7.

“Will O’Neill has the intellect and integrity to represent Newport Beach with the highest ethical standards.  When I hired Will, I knew he could handle some of California’s most complex legal issues.  I am proud to see his dedication to public service continue,” stated Marvin R. Baxter, Associate Justice, California Supreme Court (ret.)

O’Neill earned his undergraduate degree from Stanford University, where he was a member of the varsity track team, and his juris doctorate from U.C. Hastings College of the Law.  He is the recently elected president of the U.C. Hastings Alumni Association.

Newport Beach is full of talented legal minds; very few have worked at the California Supreme Court.

“I will approach my council service with the highest ethical standards, as my service at the California Supreme Court demanded. Newport Beach expects its council members to enter office with a clean ethics record and leave the same way. I expect that my background at the highest level of California’s legal system will benefit the city’s taxpayers,” concluded O’Neill.

For more information go to or follow Will O’Neill on Facebook.

Attachment:      Photo – Justice Marvin R. Baxter swearing in Will O’Neill as clerk of the California Supreme Court


Newport Beach City Council hopefuls who took the stage for the Feet to the Fire forum at Orange Coast College on Wednesday night each vowed to run a positive campaign focused on bringing fresh ideas to city government.

The caveat to that, they agreed, is if opponents attacked them first. Some campaign materials casting a negative light on candidates has already been circulated, they said.

“If someone picks on me, I’m a street fighter,” said Fred Ameri, who is running for the District 7 seat, which represents Newport Coast and Newport Ridge.

Roughly 50 community members filed into OCC’s Robert B. Moore Theatre in an effort to learn about the candidates and where each stands on issues. Daily Pilot columnist Barbara Venezia and former Daily Pilot Publisher Tom Johnson hosted the discussion, billed as being in a “talk show” format.

Newport voters will decide Nov. 8 who should fill the three available council seats.


Businessman and community activist Mike Glenn, businessman Lee Lowrey and retired educator Jeff Herdman are vying for the District 5 seat, which represents Balboa Island, Harbor Island, the Fashion Island area and a portion of Big Canyon. District 5 Councilman Ed Selich is termed out this year.

Attorney and city Finance Committee member Will O’Neill, attorney Phil Greer and Ameri, a former planning commissioner, are running for the District 7 seat. Councilman Keith Curry, who currently represents the area, is termed out.

Harbor Commissioner Brad Avery and law student Shelley Henderson are running for District 2, which represents Newport Heights and Newport Crest. The district’s current council member, Tony Petros, is not running for reelection.

Henderson, O’Neill, Avery and Lowrey did not attend Wednesday’s forum.

Feet to the Fire came a day after the Newport Beach Chamber of Commerce presented its own candidates forum.

Candidates in both discussions remained friendly with one another despite disagreeing on issues.

The conversation during both focused heavily on development in Newport Center and Banning Ranch, as well as alleviating traffic and paying down the city’s $276-million unfunded pension liability, which attendees agreed are some of the most significant issues.

Venezia and Johnson, both Newport residents themselves, quizzed candidates on how they would plan to fund public art. The issue was discussed during the 2014 election, in which four new council members — Mayor Diane Dixon, Mayor Pro Tem Kevin Muldoon and Councilmen Marshall “Duffy” Duffield and Scott Peotter — were elected on a slate known as “Team Newport.”

Some on the council have advocated for Newport’s art programs to move away from city funds and instead become privately funded through donations.

Ameri and Glenn, while both emphasizing their appreciation for the arts, said they support the private funding model. Herdman said he supports spending city money toward the arts as long as other needs like infrastructure are also being met.

Greer, whose wife is a member of the city Arts Commission, said he would be open to other funding sources but that the city should be responsible for funding some public art.

“I really believe art is integral to the community,” he said. “It gives it culture and it gives it character.”

Herdman said the decision of where to spend city dollars often gets political.

“We need to take care of our infrastructure, our basic needs and address our debt,” he said.

While the chamber-sponsored forum stuck to the issues, Feet to the Fire’s discussion also touched on the report card of the current council and the state of politics in Newport.

Greer, Glenn, Herdman and Ameri said they have been disappointed with Team Newport’s performance in the past two years.

Glenn, originally a supporter of many of Team Newport’s ideas, said he was discouraged because he felt the group did not keep campaign promises such as protecting property rights or reducing costs and taxes.

“We got duped in that election,” Glenn said. “That’s why I’m running this time.”

Candidates for the Costa Mesa City Council will take the stage at the Moore Theatre at 7 p.m. Thursday for another edition of Feet to the Fire.

Is Phil Greer OK?

Today’s Daily Journal has story regarding about Phil Greer’s serious health issues, and his inability to appear in court due to a “literally fatal” heart condition and bypass surgery.  (story attached)

We hope Phil is ok, a city council campaign can be stressful.

Apparently Judge Peter J. Wilson (not the former Governor) has serious questions about Phil’s claims of his “literally fatal” heart condition.  In attempting to dodge a June 22 hearing date in a malpractice case filed against him, Phil filed a declaration, under the penalty of perjury, saying his heart bypass surgery was May 27.  In an unrelated bankruptcy case Phil’s declaration stated the surgery was on May 27.

Once Judge Wilson saw the video of Phil campaigning for city council with a “literally fatal” heart condition things got very uncomfortable for Phil.

All my lawyer buddies tell me the State Bar rarely disciplines lawyers.  You have to really screw up to get one disciplinary action.  Two is impossible.  Phil has two, and maybe a third is one the way if he survives his “literally fatal” heart condition.




Development proposals, the city’s unfunded pension liability and the idea of eliminating the city’s business license tax were among the topics of discussion Tuesday during the first Newport Beach City Council candidate forum of the 2016 election season.

The morning forum, presented by the Chamber of Commerce, was moderated by Lucy Dunn, president of the Orange County Business Council.

“There are some very important issues facing the city,” said chamber President Steve Rosansky. “We have a chance to pick the future we think is best for Newport Beach.”

Newport voters will decide Nov. 8 who should fill three available seats on the City Council.

Businessman and community activist Mike Glenn, businessman Lee Lowrey and retired educator Jeff Herdman are vying for the District 5 seat, which represents Balboa Island, Harbor Island, the Fashion Island area and a portion of Big Canyon. Councilman Ed Selich, who currently represents District 5, is termed out this year.

Attorney and city Finance Committee member Will O’Neill, attorney Phil Greer and former Planning Commissioner Fred Ameri are running for the District 7 seat, which represents Newport Coast and Newport Ridge. Councilman Keith Curry, who currently represents the area, also is termed out.

Harbor Commissioner Brad Avery is running for the District 2 seat, which represents Newport Heights and Newport Crest. Law student Shelley Henderson has announced her intent to run but has not yet submitted paperwork to make it official. Henderson did not attend the forum. The district’s current council member, Tony Petros, is not running for reelection.

Candidates agreed that alleviating traffic congestion and paying down the city’s $276-million unfunded pension liability will remain two of Newport Beach’s biggest hurdles in the next several decades.

For the past several years, the city has used a portion of surplus money to accelerate payments to the California Public Employees’ Retirement System in an effort to more quickly pay down the pension debt and save money on interest payments.

“I think what the city is doing is the fiscally responsible thing,” Greer said. “I would continue the course that we’re on because it’s working.”

Most candidates agreed that the city has made significant strides and should continue to look at ways to ramp up payments and pay down the debt faster.

Glenn suggested reducing city staff by about 20% over 10 years through attrition to help mitigate the cost of retirement.

Lowrey suggested the possibility of investing outside the state system, which he said has proved to be a “lousy investment fund.”

Dunn sought the opinion of each candidate about the proposed development of homes, retail space and a hotel on Banning Ranch and plans to develop residential properties in Newport Center.

O’Neill was hesitant to speak in specific terms about projects being proposed because legal precedent could bar him from voting on them, if he is elected. However, he said he supports an additional residential element in Newport Center and believes the Banning Ranch project should be approved by the California Coastal Commission in September. The Newport Beach City Council has already OKd it.

Ameri said that while he believes the proposed Banning Ranch development is too large, the property owner has the right to build something on the land. Ameri added that he opposes Museum House — a proposal to add 100 residential units in a 25-story tower on the current site of the Orange County Museum of Art — because of its possible impact on traffic.

Avery said he wishes the Banning Ranch project were smaller but he wouldn’t be against the Coastal Commission approving it. He said he supports slow growth, implementing design and view corridors and receiving compensation from developers for large projects.

“I’ve lived here all my life and it’s hard for me to see the infill and growth … but at the same time, it’s the world we live in,” Avery said.

Glenn and Lowrey indicated they favor the Banning Ranch project because it would clean up the land and open it for public use.

Glenn said both Museum House and the 150 Newport Center project — a proposal to build 45 residential units in a six-story building at the site of the Beacon Bay Auto Wash — should be subject to voter approval.

Herdman said he is in favor of projects that are consistent with the city’s general plan, which serves as a blueprint for local development.

Dunn asked the candidates for their thoughts on a proposal supported by some on the current City Council to eliminate the city’s business license tax, which could result in a $4-million annual revenue loss for the city.

O’Neill said he would be interested in looking at it after the city pays down its pension obligations.

Avery agreed, saying he would consider it if it can be done in a way that makes financial sense for the city.

Lowrey advocated phasing out the tax, as did Glenn.

Herdman, Ameri and Greer said they likely would be against such a proposal if they are elected.

“I’m not in favor of reducing any kind of revenue for the city,” Herdman said. “We need to invest that money wisely.”

[email protected]

Twitter: @HannahFryTCN


The same city staff that incurred $281 million in debt service to finance the Civic Center complex doesn’t want voters to have a say in the amount of debt financing required for large projects.

If you watched the July 26 Newport Beach City Council meeting, you probably saw the exchange between staff and myself regarding certificates of participation (COPs). When a municipality seeks to fund large projects using debt financing without getting voter approval, it circumvents the two-thirds popular vote required to issue bonds by using COPs instead.

COPs do not require a vote of the people, but they have the same effect bonds have of dedicating future revenue to make payments on the loan. In the case of our Civic Center, lease payments are made by the city to occupy its own City Hall.

Although the city had managed to operate for almost 100 years without using COPs, city staff stated that it would be a bad idea to require a popular vote to do so going forward: “We have a highly educated constituency, but they generally don’t have the time or interest to get into the minutia of mundane public infrastructure projects.”

I respectfully disagree. There is nothing minute or mundane about incurring $281 million in debt service on a Civic Center.

I believe Newport Beach residents are educated and interested enough to have a say in large projects that require debt financing.

With the assistance and vetting of our outside bond counsel, we have drafted the Newport Beach Taxpayer Protection Act to include a vote of residents to approve new projects more than $10 million when financed with COPs. This would not apply to the refinancing of existing debt.

Should the charter amendment pass, COPs may be used for large projects more than $10 millionif a compelling case is made to a majority of the residents in a general or special election. If the case can’t be made, then the council can still use the cash on hand, reserves, a line of credit, or simply wait for sufficient funds to commence a project.

If you would like a say in large projects that require debt financing, then I ask for your support for the Newport Beach Taxpayer Protection Act.

KEVIN MULDOON is mayor pro tem of Newport Beach.

Copyright © 2016, Daily Pilot


When Newport Beach City Council candidate Michael Glenn thinks of freedom, that includes the freedom to choose how to donate, be it with dollars, pesos or bitcoin.

Glenn claims to be the first local politician to accept campaign donations in the esoteric digital currency. He is seeking the Balboa Peninsula’s 1st District council seat being vacated by Mike Henn. Also in the race are businesswoman Diane Dixon and Harbor Commissioner Joe Stapleton.

Glenn’s announcement comes just weeks after individuals used bitcoin to pay for a Tesla, and then a Lamborghini, from a Costa Mesa dealership.

But as the chief executive of a web development company, Glenn felt familiar with the virtual currency — created by a computer programmer in 2009 — long before it appeared in recent headlines. He even possessed some bitcoins himself.

The idea to accept bitcoins percolated in his mind until, after about two months of research into potential legal issues, Glenn took his online payment system live Wednesday.

While he is not sure how many donations — if any — will eventually come of it, he sees the move as being in line with the ideology of an open and accessible politician who simultaneously desires to be inclusive and challenge the status quo.

“The things I’m doing are not necessarily for the benefit of my campaign,” he said. “They’re for the benefit of where I think the structure should be going.”

From a donor’s perspective, the process for giving by using bitcoins mirrors that of giving by way of credit card. Users click a “donate now” button atop Glenn’s webpage. They select the dollar amount they would like to give, enter the necessary personal information and proceed to a payment page, where they enter credit card information or receive steps for sending their bitcoins.

A processing agency called Coinbase receives the bitcoins, converts them into dollars and passes the money into Glenn’s account.

Glenn, a Balboa Peninsula resident, feels confident that this process helps to ensure the California Fair Political Practices Commission stipulation that only a singular bank account be used for donations. He said he does not ever handle the bitcoins himself.

He said his account has already received donations.

[For the record, 11:31 a.m. Dec. 20: An earlier version of this story incorrectly identified Joe Stapleton’s first name as Patrick.]

Copyright © 2016, Los Angeles Times