Newport’s Taj Mahal will hit $145 million by the time all the change orders are in. I am reminded of candidate and architect Rush Hill’s commitment to cap the project at $90 million because “the council is really on top of this.” Check out his YouTube video below.
Stop The Dock Tax
www.stopthedocktax.com Please check with our web site for the lastest information
Your donations keep us in court and communicating with the community. You can safely donate on line here to help continue our campaign to Stop the Dock Tax.
YARD SIGNS ARE AVAILABLE
Call to arrange a time to pick up your Stop The Dock Tax sign.
1410 South Bay Front
Newport Civic Center cost rises to almost $140 million
By DEEPA BHARATH
NEWPORT BEACH City officials are asking the City Council for an extra $6.5 million to finish the new Civic Center, which has already been hotly criticized for its price tag.
City staff members will come to the council Tuesday to get approval for the extra amount in change orders for the project, bumping up the total cost to $139.9 million, according to a staff report by Project Manager Steve Badum.
The report recommends that the project’s contingency fund be increased from $1.6 million to $6.5 million and authorizes City Manager Dave Kiff and Badum to negotiate additional project changes in an amount not to exceed $4.8 million.
Staff is also requesting an amendment to the contract with architectural firm Bohlin Cywinski Jackson to increase the original contract by $579,670 to a revised cost not to exceed $4.9 million. The staff report says there is enough money in the Civic Center’s Capital Project fund to support these increases and that this is not going over the $140 million total project cost they predicted in 2010.
The civic center and park projects are almost complete and will officially be concluded in July after the final “punch list” items are completed, the staff report said.
Badum says in his report that “despite considerable effort and oversight,” the amount of contract change orders went from the initial goal of 2.5 percent of the total construction cost to about 6 percent.
“Six percent is a much more of a typical contingency amount for a construction project of this magnitude,” he said in the report, citing 760 changes to the project, most of which come in under $10,000 each.
City officials had previously estimated the cost at about $132 million, but a review of the project documentation by the Orange County Register in April showed that the final project cost was closer to $139 million.
A review of city finance documents at the time also showed that the final price tag, factoring in the cost of financing the project over 30 years, could exceed $237 million.
Because of the extra funding that’s being sought, the project’s price tag could increase even more.
Here are some items that have caused the price to escalate, according to the staff report:
Changes to the San Miguel Pedestrian Bridge design. Instead of a concrete finish for the elevator tower, the council picked a zinc metal clad option. The cost of revising plans and structural dimensions totals $22,675.
A landscape feature with a 108-inch box coastal live oak and assorted rock boulders will cost $9,960.
Replacement of leaking library windows, $28,760.
Additional signage at $11,125.
Additional travel allowance of up to $69,000 for architects who have had to make more visits to the site “due to the pace of the construction project.”
Extra architect fees of $315,000 after the city extended the firm’s services to complete the project. Hourly rates remain the same.
Additional architect expenses from January 2013 to completion date add up to $123,150.
Badum says the entire project is still expected to come in at $139.9 million, but the final cost will not be known until the project is completed next month. The council will merely take a “budgeting action” Tuesday, he said.
Councilwoman Leslie Daigle said the request for additional funds comes as a surprise to her.
“This is the first I’ve heard of it,” she said.
Resident Denys Oberman, a vocal critic of what she believes is an “extravagant” project, has sent a written objection to council members questioning the rationale for the increase in project costs.
“The city has already committed significant funds and incurred significant debt in connection with the civic center and park project,” she wrote to council members. “There are other initiatives and projects which would provide much greater economic and other public benefit – both to the city and to its constituents.”
Badum says in his report that he recognizes some in the community “remain frustrated with the overall cost of the project.”
“… They think the project only involved a city hall building,” he says. “We understand that. … Our hope is that over time, community members will utilize and enjoy their civic center and see that this was the right investment in the right project at the right time.”