Source: Newport Independent
February 26, 2016
Posted On 26 Feb 2016
By : Guest Contributor
0 0 Share0 0 0
Rebuttal to Keith Curry Op-Ed (NB Indy Forum, Feb. 19):
Losing has been hard on Keith Curry. He lost his Assembly race by 20 percent, including Newport by 10 percent, even his own neighborhood voted against him.
The voters rejected Curry. He wanted to eliminate the fire rings at the beach because they attracted people who had “zip code envy” and the wrong kind of people. He also tried to double the dock tax.
His recent manifesto of “political reforms” for the city accuses fellow councilmembers of corruption and undue influence from lobbyists.
Councilman Keith Curry is throwing stones from a glass house. Curry has run for office three times, twice for Newport Beach council and of course his 2014 Assembly campaign. He’s raised large sums from lobbyists during his 10-year political career.
A glance at Curry’s Assembly donations reads like a Who’s Who of Newport Beach developers and companies seeking City contracts, including vendors of the $142 million Civic Center – the same project he recently voted against auditing.
In his professional career at PFM, Keith Curry was a lobbyist. He lobbied local government to issue debt. That was his job. Even his former company, PFM, has contracted with the City of Newport Beach during his tenure.
Curry wants you to believe that lobbyists just like him are ruining our City, and calls for them to register. Lobbyist registration is a solution looking for a problem. If the mayor is so inclined she could appoint a Blue Ribbon panel to explore the idea of lobbyist registration. The committee’s first job will be to define a lobbyist; does the chamber president who lobbies the city for private gain qualify? Would former mayor and senior citizen advocate Evelyn Hart qualify? Would slow growth icon Jean Watt have to register? How about clean water advocate Nancy Skinner? Would former mayor and city council fundraiser Dennis O’Neill qualify?
Curry doesn’t want anyone who opposes his political agenda on council to raise the money he raised. Others must do what he says, but not what he does. Curry acts as if only he and his pals from the Old Guard care about the City.
Curry doesn’t understand that the community exercised its First Amendment right to donate hundreds of thousands of dollars for change at city hall. They donated because politicians like him violated our trust. Big government politicians like Curry think regulation is always the solution.
Curry wants you to believe that the new “Team” are the bad people and accuses them of doing exactly what he did for a living and while in office. His proposed reforms were really just veiled mudslinging at people he views as his political opponents.